Monday, August 10, 2009

Fragment -- #163

January 2001 journal entry]

What accounts for my move so many standard deviations away from the mean in my approach to ethics and spirituality?

  1. Doctoral studies in the field of history led to my adopting/forming a radically modern/critical historiography.
  2. Existential experience with chronic illness and death (i.e., my first wife’s multiple sclerosis and death) during my 20s led to my resolving to align with the marginalized/outcast (i.e., a ‘from below’ perspective/journey).
  3. Being born within and raised within a fundamentalist Christian denomination created firsthand knowledge of the ‘black hole’ inward pull of the ‘religious’ sphere.
  4. Taking/finding opportunities to move outside the ‘religious’ sphere (personally and professionally) led to my thinking in the world’s ‘marketplaces’ and ‘wildernesses’ without the blinders/restrictions of the ‘religious’ sphere.
  5. My resolve to strive for consistency in multiple diverse conversations required that I prioritize my place in those conversations.
  6. Exposure to the breadth and depth of human suffering -- symbolized by my first wife’s experience with multiple sclerosis -- led to my crossing a threshold beyond which I could not forget, minimize, or compartmentalize such realities.

My sense is

  1. that few individuals face such a combination of experiences,
  2. that few individuals who face one or some combination of such experiences pursue the implications radically to the end, and
  3. that facing simultaneously an increasing number of such experiences multiplies the force/resolve/initiative to follow out the implications radically to the end.